Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Cookie_Jar::offsetExists($key) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetExists(mixed $offset): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Cookie/Jar.php on line 63

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Cookie_Jar::offsetGet($key) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetGet(mixed $offset): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Cookie/Jar.php on line 73

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Cookie_Jar::offsetSet($key, $value) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetSet(mixed $offset, mixed $value): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Cookie/Jar.php on line 89

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Cookie_Jar::offsetUnset($key) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetUnset(mixed $offset): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Cookie/Jar.php on line 102

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Cookie_Jar::getIterator() should either be compatible with IteratorAggregate::getIterator(): Traversable, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Cookie/Jar.php on line 111

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Utility_CaseInsensitiveDictionary::offsetExists($key) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetExists(mixed $offset): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Utility/CaseInsensitiveDictionary.php on line 40

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Utility_CaseInsensitiveDictionary::offsetGet($key) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetGet(mixed $offset): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Utility/CaseInsensitiveDictionary.php on line 51

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Utility_CaseInsensitiveDictionary::offsetSet($key, $value) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetSet(mixed $offset, mixed $value): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Utility/CaseInsensitiveDictionary.php on line 68

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Utility_CaseInsensitiveDictionary::offsetUnset($key) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetUnset(mixed $offset): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Utility/CaseInsensitiveDictionary.php on line 82

Deprecated: Return type of Requests_Utility_CaseInsensitiveDictionary::getIterator() should either be compatible with IteratorAggregate::getIterator(): Traversable, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Utility/CaseInsensitiveDictionary.php on line 91

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/Requests/Cookie/Jar.php:15) in /home1/photorad/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments for PhotoRadarAhead.com https://www.photoradarahead.com Warning! Photo Radar Ahead Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:45:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.6 Comment on Portland by Photoradarahead https://www.photoradarahead.com/portland/#comment-2619 Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:45:34 +0000 http://beta.photoradarahead.com/#comment-2619 In reply to Nick Buell.

For the photo radar vans, It is determined by the law, 10 miles an hour over the posted limit. Then it has to be verified and signed off by the officer that was posted in the van.
For red light tickets, the infractions are determined by computer, then verified by a human. An officer from the jurisdiction then signs off on the infraction issuing the citation. In both cases they look to see if the driver is visible and attempt to verify if the gender of the driver matches the gender of the registered owner of the vehicle. When they can’t make a determination, a citation is not issued.

]]>
Comment on Portland by Nick Buell https://www.photoradarahead.com/portland/#comment-2617 Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:24:25 +0000 http://beta.photoradarahead.com/#comment-2617 Who determines the threshold of when a driver gets a ticket? Is it set by the police department, individual officer discretion or the supplier of the photo radar company? Any help with this question will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Nick B.

]]>
Comment on Photo Radar resurrected in Milwaukie by John https://www.photoradarahead.com/2011/05/photo-radar-resurrected-in-milwaukie/#comment-2075 Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:43:31 +0000 http://www.photoradarahead.com/?p=425#comment-2075 The Mayor wrote a thoughtful letter. It’s nice to see he really thought about the use of Photo Radar Ticketing.

However, there are better ways to promote safety on the roads than punitive measures. These include LED Speed Limit signs (which the mayor mentioned), as well as warning flags on speed limit signs when there is a reduction in speed. There is also the general rule, supported by traffic engineers, of setting the speed limit at the 85th percentile of what speed drivers drive at. All three measures are proven effective, and don’t require punishing otherwise good citizens and hurting the perception of local government by the citizens (which photo traffic enforcement does).

In the end I won’t be shopping in Milwaukie, which is too bad for local businesses. I don’t feel safe around photo enforcement as it makes other drivers unpredictable, and I feel towns that use photo enforcement don’t use proper traffic engineering (too short yellow lights, speed limits below the 85th percentile, speed limits that go up and down for no apparent reason, poor signage, poor intersection and lane markings).

]]>
Comment on Portland by Adam https://www.photoradarahead.com/portland/#comment-1352 Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:37:04 +0000 http://beta.photoradarahead.com/#comment-1352 Hmm se hawthorne blvd @ 2400 blk wst . I dont recall ever seeing any van or sign and no other history of this location online anyone seen this van??

]]>
Comment on Onramp to I84 clarified on KATU by Scott https://www.photoradarahead.com/2011/03/onramp-to-i84-clarified-on-katu/#comment-1139 Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:36:26 +0000 http://www.photoradarahead.com/?p=363#comment-1139 The Willow Street on ramp speed limit has changed to 30 mph. I challenged my ticket in court and got as close to winning my ticket as possible. The judge discharged my ticket. I don’t think he wanted to give me a total win, because I argued that the speed limit was illegal. I did prove it, but the judge interpreted “through traffic” differently than traffic engineers and since “through traffic” isn’t defined in statutes, I couldn’t refute what the judge was saying. BUT like I said I did enough that he discharged the ticket ($0 fine). I think the judges concern was that if the signs were proven to be illegal, then thousands of tickets were illegal.

After Joe Rose’s article in the Oregonian, I made a ton of calls to ODOT and Portland Bureau of Transportation doing research and I think I made some people nervous when I pointed out the MUTCD rules, the 85th % speeds, and Oregon Revised Statutes. I was even researching if ODOT/PBoT was breaking federal law under MUTCD. In any case, they changed the limit. The 85th % speed on this street is 35-41 mph according to PBoT records. As long as the radar van keeps the margin of error at 10mph over, then people driving in the 85th % speed should be ok going forward. It is a tricky street.

]]>
Comment on Portland by Abarmaenemi https://www.photoradarahead.com/portland/#comment-724 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:12:46 +0000 http://beta.photoradarahead.com/#comment-724 Hello! Just want to say thank you for this interesting article! =) Peace, Joy.

]]>
Comment on Portland van not in compliance by My Homepage https://www.photoradarahead.com/2009/12/portland-van-not-in-compliance/#comment-719 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:41:40 +0000 http://beta.photoradarahead.com/?p=58#comment-719 Informative Site

]]>
Comment on ORS by Dandre Pinkney https://www.photoradarahead.com/ors/#comment-714 Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:43:01 +0000 http://beta.photoradarahead.com/#comment-714 This is one awesome post. Will read on…

]]>
Comment on Portland by anoy https://www.photoradarahead.com/portland/#comment-558 Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:27:33 +0000 http://beta.photoradarahead.com/#comment-558 beware in residential route to pcc campus at sylvania campuse

]]>
Comment on Portland by Dave Brunker https://www.photoradarahead.com/portland/#comment-43 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:58:47 +0000 http://beta.photoradarahead.com/#comment-43 Photo radar trailer @ aprox 6005 NE Willow, Portland, Oregon. twitter = @dbrunker

]]>